How to Read FC26 Pro Clubs Stats: A Real Nations League Match

Explore real FC26 Pro Clubs passing stats: 15/16 passes, 93.8% accuracy, source gameplay and a guide to reading match evidence on EasyChamp.

A 93.8% passing figure becomes more useful when you can see its denominator, the match it belongs to and what remains unreported. Here is a real Nations League example you can open yourself.

In Italy’s 1–1 game against Portugal, Portugal player ForYoubabe_ has 15 completed passes from 16 attempts, displayed as 93.8%, with a recorded match rating of 7.2. This article walks through that actual EasyChamp record, rather than presenting a made-up dashboard.

Real Nations League gameplay and EasyChamp passing-stat example for ForYoubabe_: 15 of 16 passes, 93.8%, rating 7.2.
Gameplay and platform measurement from the Italy–Portugal 1–1 fixture. Individual passing values are platform records; the underlying personal passing screenshot was not recovered.

1. Start with the exact match

The same countries met more than once. Italy 1–1 Portugal and Portugal 2–2 Italy are separate fixtures with different personal measurements. Always open the match first, then use Stats → Extended. Checking only the team names can attach a valid number to the wrong game.

ForYoubabe_’s 15/16 equals 93.75%, rounded to 93.8%. In the separate 2–2 fixture, rafael_robim has a recorded 7/7 passing line and rating of 7.7. A 100% figure from seven attempts is a small sample, not evidence that someone was the best passer across the tournament.

2. Separate team statistics from individual statistics

The 1–1 match lists Italy at 84% team pass accuracy and Portugal at 81%. Those are team figures. ForYoubabe_’s 93.8% is an individual measurement from the extended player table; it should not replace Portugal’s team percentage.

Actual Italy–Portugal extended statistics page, showing separate team totals and nine published Portugal player records.
Actual public match page captured on 14 September. Inspect the live extended table.

The page reports nine Portugal players with published statistics and no Italy players with published statistics. Missing values mean unknown, not zero. For example, an empty touches field does not establish that a player never touched the ball.

3. Watch the actual source game

EliteGaming’s Portugal–Italy broadcast includes the group games discussed here. The player below opens at 44:00 for the 1–1 example; the separate 2–2 game is referenced at 22:30. These are source offsets in the broadcast, not in-game match-clock times.

Watch the 1–1 source segment · Open the 2–2 source segment. YouTube loads on this page only after you press the button.

4. Follow the evidence and player history

Where available, a match’s Screenshots section links uploaded reporting images. The competition statistics view connects recorded players and their match histories. Check the number of rated games before interpreting an average, and read any source or reconciliation label alongside the value.

Passing values above were checked against the current public platform records. The underlying individual passing originals were not recovered, so those numbers are not independently reverified from personal screenshots here. Coverage remains incomplete. The Saudi Arabia–Chile final has score evidence but no supplied individual ratings; this article makes no final-MVP claim.

A reporting checklist for organizers

For each fixture, keep the full-time score image, team-stat screen and supplied individual-performance images together. Retain the exact game identity and leg. When a measurement is missing or a result is disputed, keep that status visible until an authorized organizer resolves it. A small set of traceable measurements is more useful than a complete-looking table filled with guesses.

Start with our league organization guide for scheduling and result-reporting rules, or explore EasyChamp’s esports tools.

How to Read FC26 Pro Clubs Stats From a Real Match